Assessing President Joe Biden’s foreign policy decisions, particularly concerning China, reveals criticism for what many perceive as a weak and detrimental approach. Detractors argue that this approach has contributed to global instability and compromised national security. Supporters of this viewpoint present the withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russian aggression in Ukraine, the resurgence of terrorism against Israel, and China’s increased belligerence in the South Pacific and towards Taiwan as evidence of the failure in Biden’s foreign policy. This article articulates the claim that the Biden administration’s actions reflect appeasement towards China, disregarding vital issues such as human rights violations, intellectual property theft, and economic coercion. It advocates for a more robust approach, emphasizing the protection of American interests, values, and economic independence.
The Problem of Appeasement:
This article contends that the Biden administration’s approach to China demonstrates appeasement rather than firmness. A specific example cited is the recent climate change summit between John Kerry and his Chinese counterpart, which is viewed as prioritizing immediate policy concessions over the long-term interests of the American people. The argument posits that China consistently fails to honor agreements, resulting in detrimental economic and regulatory consequences for ordinary Americans. Additionally, the article critiques the administration’s failure to address China’s evasion of sanctions, human rights abuses against the Uyghur population, intellectual property theft, and threats towards Taiwan, suggesting a willingness to turn a blind eye for short-term gains.
The CCP’s Global Ambitions:
It is contended that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) actively seeks to challenge the United States as the predominant global superpower, employing any means necessary. The belief that economic liberalization would pave the way for a more open and free China has proven false, with the CCP increasing control over its citizens. To safeguard American interests and its people, the article argues for a strategic disentanglement from China’s economic ties, advocating for engagement with the international community from a position of strength.
Advocating a Stronger Approach:
This article presents a comprehensive approach to handling China, highlighting the importance of cybersecurity, addressing trade imbalances, promoting human rights, and fostering domestic energy production. It emphasizes the necessity of enhancing cybersecurity measures to protect critical infrastructure and guard against cyber threats from China. Addressing trade imbalances is seen as imperative to ensure that economic relationships with China do not disproportionately benefit them to the detriment of American workers. The article calls for raising awareness and taking action against China’s human rights abuses as a way of promoting human rights globally. Lastly, it advocates for fostering domestic energy production to reduce dependence on China and strengthen national security.
Critics assert that President Biden’s approach to China’s foreign policy has been weak and detrimental, contributing to global instability and posing threats to national security. This article underscores the need for a stronger approach that prioritizes safeguarding U.S. interests and values. By engaging with China and the international community from a position of strength, the United States has the potential to work towards a more stable and secure world, while ensuring the safety and prosperity of its own citizens.