An internal memo from December 2020, recently made public by The New York Times, reveals the Trump campaign’s strategy to undermine the Electoral College process after the 2020 election loss.
The plan involved nominating fake GOP electors in swing states and having Vice President Mike Pence claim constitutional authority to count their votes during the Electoral College certification.
A Risky Strategy Acknowledged by the Architect
Pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro, the author of the memo, acknowledged that the strategy was unlikely to succeed and would probably be rejected by the Supreme Court.
Despite the anticipated rejection, Chesebro argued that pursuing this controversial approach would draw attention to alleged electoral abuses and provide more time for litigation to sway the election outcome.
Alternative Scheme Emerges After Failed Attempts
With attempts to convince state officials to not certify Joe Biden’s victories unsuccessful, the Trump campaign devised this alternative scheme.
The recently indicted former President Donald Trump is implicated in this scheme along with Rudy Giuliani, as detailed in the federal indictment and prior CNN reporting.
Orchestrating the Fake Electors Scheme
Trump campaign officials and Rudy Giuliani were involved in coordinating the fake electors scheme, according to the indictment and CNN reporting.
The plan required collaboration with GOP state operatives, recruiting elector supporters, arranging meeting rooms, and circulating counterfeit certificates for the fake electors to sign.
The Strategy Unveiled as More Than Political Theatrics
Initially seen as political theatrics, it became clear that this was a calculated strategy.
Prosecutors allege that Chesebro, identified as co-conspirator 1, communicated with Giuliani regarding concerns of treason related to the actions of Arizona’s electors.
Despite Challenges, the Plan Proceeds
Chesebro’s memo encouraged the Trump-Pence electors to cast their votes as planned on December 14, 2020.
Despite expecting legal challenges, the scheme was carried out with some individuals facing legal consequences, including forgery charges and criminal investigations.
Memo Reveals Trump’s Electoral College Manipulation Plan
The New York Times releases an internal memo detailing Trump’s strategy to undermine the Electoral College process.
Fake GOP electors were aimed to be inserted into swing states, bolstered by claims of constitutional authority by Vice President Mike Pence.
Calculated Scheme to Overturn Election Results
Pro-Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro’s memo outlines a calculated strategy to divert public attention and potentially sway the electoral outcome.
Despite anticipating a Supreme Court rejection, Chesebro argues that pursuing this controversial approach would help challenge alleged electoral abuses by Democrats.
Trump Campaign’s Efforts to Undermine Election Results
Unable to convince state officials not to certify Joe Biden’s victories, the Trump campaign formulates an alternative scheme.
Former President Donald Trump, along with Rudy Giuliani, is implicated in orchestrating the fake electors scheme, leading to federal indictment.
Coordinated Efforts to Manipulate Electoral Votes
Trump campaign officials and Rudy Giuliani are revealed to be involved in coordinating the fake electors scheme.
The plan involved collaboration with GOP state operatives, recruitment of elector supporters, and the distribution of counterfeit certificates for signing.
From Political Theatrics to Calculated Strategy
Initially perceived as political theatrics, it becomes evident that the fake electors scheme was a calculated strategy.
Prosecutors claim that Chesebro communicated with Giuliani, expressing concerns of treason related to the actions of Arizona’s electors.
Facing Legal Consequences for Electoral Manipulation
Despite expecting challenges, Chesebro’s memo encouraged the Trump-Pence electors to proceed with their plan.
Many individuals involved in signing fake certificates have faced legal consequences, including charges of forgery and being part of criminal investigations.
More from The Stock Dork – Dershowitz Predicts SCOTUS Will Overturn Trump’s January 6 Conviction
Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz predicts that the Supreme Court will overturn a conviction of former President Donald Trump for his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. He expressed this belief during an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.”
Discussion on Indictment
Dershowitz pointed out that the indictment claims Trump believed he lost the election and everything he did was fraudulent. However, he emphasized that there is no smoking gun or credible testimony indicating that Trump personally admitted to losing the election.
Lack of Evidence
Dershowitz highlighted the challenge of proving the claims made in the indictment. He noted that there is no concrete evidence to support the allegations against Trump.
Concerns Over Jury Pool
Dershowitz expressed concerns about the jury pool in the District of Columbia, where 90 percent reportedly voted against Trump. He doubted that a conviction would survive appellate review and review in the Supreme Court due to this potential bias.
Doubts about Survival
Dershowitz cast doubt on the survival of a conviction from a D.C. jury during the appeals process. He believes that the Supreme Court would likely overturn a conviction from this case.
Expectations for the Appeals Process
Dershowitz predicts that Trump may lose in the D.C. Circuit’s state court of appeals. However, he remains optimistic that Trump will win in the United States Supreme Court if they grant review.
Confidence in Supreme Court Review
Dershowitz believes that the Supreme Court should grant review of this case. He expresses confidence that the Court would ultimately rule in Trump’s favor.
Despite potential challenges, Dershowitz maintains an optimistic outlook for Trump’s chances in the Supreme Court. He firmly believes that a conviction will be overturned if the case reaches the highest court.
Supreme Court’s Potential Role
Dershowitz sees the Supreme Court’s intervention as crucial to determining the outcome of this case. He believes they have the power to overturn any conviction against Trump.
Implications for the Judicial System
Dershowitz’s prediction raises questions about the fairness of the judicial process in cases involving high-profile individuals. The potential overturning of Trump’s conviction could have lasting impacts on future political trials.
Controversy and Divisiveness
The discussions surrounding Trump’s conviction highlight the deep political divide in the country. Dershowitz’s predictions and arguments contribute to the ongoing controversy and debate.
The future of Trump’s conviction and the impact it might have on his political standing remain uncertain. Dershowitz’s insights provide a different perspective on the case, further clouding its outcome.