During the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government’s hearing on censorship, Emma-Jo Morris stated that the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story constituted election interference.
Confirmation of Factual Accuracy and FBI Involvement
Representative Elise Stefanik raised the issue and both agreed that the story had been proven to be “100 percent factually accurate.” Morris confirmed that the FBI had obtained Hunter Biden’s laptop ten months before her story broke.
Read More: These Celebrities Have Publicly Criticized Donald Trump!
Allegations of Coercion and Illegal Censorship
Stefanik then highlighted the alleged coercion of social media companies by the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force in relation to a Russian “hack and leak operation” and its subsequent illegal censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Morris agreed with Stefanik’s assertion.
Taxpayer Funding of Censorship
The discussion turned to whether taxpayers had funded the censorship by government agencies such as the FBI, to which Morris also agreed.
Contents of the Hunter Biden Laptop
Stefanik provided a brief overview of the contents found on the Hunter Biden laptop, describing it as a “hellhole and cesspool of corruption and criminal conduct.” She mentioned hard drugs, prostitution, pornography, money laundering, Biden family shell companies, connections to Communist China, corrupt foreign governments, and deals involving tens of millions of dollars in exchange for access to the Biden family.
Read Also: These Celebrities All Support Trump
Impact on the 2020 Election
Stefanik referenced polling data indicating that a significant number of people would have changed their vote in the 2020 election had they been aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story at the time. She argued that the government’s censorship was aimed at protecting and promoting Joe Biden’s candidacy.
Agreement on Election Interference
Morris agreed that the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story was determinative in the 2020 election, citing various polls that suggested a potential change in the election outcome. She emphasized that government censorship of speech hinders clear thinking and acknowledged that it constituted election interference.
Conclusion
Emma-Jo Morris’s testimony highlighted the belief that the government’s censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop story constituted interference in the 2020 election. The discussion revolved around the factual accuracy of the story, alleged coercion by the FBI, taxpayer funding of censorship, and the potential impact on voter decisions.
Read Next: 10 Things You Probably Didn’t Know About Tucker Carlson
Malik is a skilled writer with a passion for news and current events. With their keen eye for detail, they provide insightful perspectives on the latest happenings. Stay informed and engaged!
Tags:
