Former personal attorney and fixer to Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, has criticized the ex-president’s strategy of relying on his children’s testimonies in the ongoing New York civil fraud trial. Cohen argues that rather than safeguarding his children, Trump’s approach puts them in jeopardy of being trapped into committing perjury. He highlights instances where he believes Trump Jr. and Eric Trump have lied under oath, emphasizing the potential legal consequences of their statements. Cohen also points out Ivanka Trump’s repeated claims of memory lapses during her testimony.
Trump’s Children Face Potential Perjury Charges as Cohen Warns Against Legal Traps
Trump’s Children and Perjury Traps: Expressing concern for Trump’s children, Michael Cohen draws attention to their involvement in the ongoing fraud trial and the possible perjury charges they may face. He criticizes Donald Trump Jr.’s testimony, specifically when describing himself as a “broker” on the stand, deeming it a falsehood. Cohen further accuses Eric Trump of perjury due to his claim of sole responsibility for concrete pouring within the Trump Organization. Additionally, Cohen raises doubts about Ivanka Trump’s repeated failure to recall certain details during her testimony, drawing a comparison to allegations about Joe Biden’s cognitive abilities.
Confusion Surrounds Trump’s Strategy of Involving His Children in Trial, Cohen Raises Doubts
Trump’s Strategy Questioned: Michael Cohen questions Donald Trump’s choice to involve his children in the New York civil fraud trial, perplexed by the potential legal consequences this decision might have for his offspring. As a parent, it would be expected that Trump would prioritize protecting his children rather than exposing them to legal scrutiny. Cohen expresses confusion over the overall strategy behind this approach, struggling to comprehend its logic.
Michael Cohen Highlights Risks Faced by Trump’s Children in Legal Battle
Michael Cohen vehemently criticizes Donald Trump’s “stupid strategy” of involving his children in the ongoing New York civil fraud trial. Cohen argues that by doing so, Trump puts his children at risk of falling into perjury traps, pointing out instances where he believes they have lied under oath. Cohen questions the reasoning behind Trump’s decision, emphasizing that safeguarding his children should take precedence over any potential personal benefit. These remarks underscore Cohen’s concerns about Trump’s legal strategy and the potential consequences it may have for his children.