1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics
  4. /
  5. Slideshow
  6. /
  7. New York Policy Change...

New York Policy Change Allows Cash Payment for Migrants

New York’s rule change expands eligibility for cash payments to migrants.

Under Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul’s administration, rules were quietly amended in May to include non-citizens with pending asylum applications.

Program Modification

Credits: DepositPhotos

The state’s “Safety Net Assistance” program was adapted to include migrants awaiting asylum.

This change was orchestrated by New York’s Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance.

Specific details regarding the number of beneficiaries remain undisclosed.

Financial Allocation

Credits: DepositPhotos

Approximately $4.3 billion was allocated by the governor to address the migrant crisis.

However, only a fraction of this amount has been utilized for cash payments.

The OTDA estimates that only a small percentage of the migrant population qualifies for benefits.

Potential Recipients

Credit: DepositPhotos

Over 173,000 migrants have arrived in New York City since 2022.

If 10% of them are eligible, it could result in about 17,000 recipients in NYC alone.

Eligibility is contingent upon asylum paperwork completion.

Payment Usage

Credits: DepositPhotos

Recipients may utilize the cash payments for rent, utilities, clothing, and other essentials.

The checks amount to hundreds of dollars per month and are aimed at easing the financial burdens of migrants awaiting asylum decisions.

Criticism from Republicans

Credit: DepositPhotos

Michael Kracker, Eire County Republican Committee chairman, finds the payments offensive.

He highlights the struggles of homeless veterans and native New Yorkers and critiques the prioritization of non-citizens over citizens in need.

Rep. Malliotakis’ Perspective

Credit: DepositPhotos

Rep. Nicole Malliotakis criticizes the policy as an incentive for migration to New York.

Concerns are raised about the strain on taxpayers amidst struggling lower- and middle-class citizens.

Allegations of attracting migrants through liberal programs are made.

Democratic Criticism

Credit: DepositPhotos

Democratic City Councilman Robert Holden voices disapproval of continuous handouts to migrants.

He calls it a disservice to citizens who’ve contributed to the country and highlights tensions between providing aid to migrants and supporting citizens.

Heritage Foundation’s View

Credit: Depositphotos

Lora Ries, director at The Heritage Foundation, advocates prioritizing U.S. citizens over illegal migrants.

She criticizes the policy as encouraging further illegal immigration and warns of draining taxpayer resources without addressing root issues.

Clarity from OTDA

Credits: DepositPhotos

The OTDA emphasizes that eligibility is limited to individuals in the country legally and denies benefits to those residing illegally.

The agency aims to dispel misconceptions about the program.

Political Divide

Credits: DepositPhotos

The policy shift reflects broader political divisions on immigration.

Democrats emphasize compassion and inclusivity, while Republicans emphasize prioritizing citizens and enforcing immigration laws.

Legal and Moral Dilemmas

Credit: DepositPhotos

The debate extends beyond legality to moral considerations.

Balancing humanitarian concerns with fiscal responsibility illustrates the complexity of immigration policy.

Immigration Debate Continues 

Credits: DepositPhotos

New York’s rule change extends aid to migrants awaiting asylum and raises questions about priorities, resources, and immigration policy.

It reflects ongoing debates on immigration and social welfare.

Read More From The Stock Dork

Credit: DepositPhotos