1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics
  4. /
  5. Slideshow
  6. /
  7. Political Analyst Questions Effectiveness...

Political Analyst Questions Effectiveness of Biden’s Middle East Strikes

The United States conducted military strikes in Iraq and Syria, targeting suspected Iranian Revolutionary Guards positions and allied militias.

These operations were a response to a drone attack in Jordan that killed three U.S. service members.

The Objective

Credits: DepositPhotos

The airstrikes were aimed at preventing further escalation in the Middle East.

The targeted operations began on February 2nd, signaling a direct retaliation for the recent aggression.

Public Reaction

Credits: DepositPhotos

Bryan Leib, a former political candidate, expressed the collective hope of Americans for these airstrikes to meaningfully curb terrorism.

He underscored the bipartisan desire for effective action.

Strategic Skepticism

Credits: DepositPhotos

Despite hopes for their success, there is skepticism about whether the airstrikes hit significant targets.

Leib highlighted concerns over the strategic impact of these operations.

Administrative Decisions

Credits: DepositPhotos

The Biden administration took five days to respond after announcing its intentions.

This delay has raised questions about the effectiveness and timing of the counterstrike.

Further Developments

Credit: DepositPhotos

Another drone strike in Syria resulted in the deaths of six U.S.-backed Kurdish fighters.

This attack underscores the ongoing risks in the region.

Widening Conflict

CredIt: YEMEN, Sanaa : Shiite-Houthi supporters raise rifles during a demonstration in Sanaa on October 2, 2015, against ongoing military operations carried out by the Saudi-led coalition. — Photo by YAY_Images

The U.S. has also targeted the Houthi terrorist group in Yemen, expanding the operational focus.

These strikes are part of a broader effort to address regional threats.

Iranian Response

Credit: DepositPhotos

Iran has denied involvement with the groups attacking U.S. interests.

Yet, the U.S. strikes have been condemned by Tehran, highlighting the geopolitical tension.

Denial of Proxy Involvement

Credit: DepositPhotos

Despite cheering attacks against Israel and commercial vessels, Iran denies arming or directing these groups.

This stance has been consistent, even as attacks continue.

International Condemnations

Credits: DepositPhotos

Following the US retaliation, Iran criticized the strikes for deepening regional tensions.

The Iranian Foreign Ministry called for addressing the root causes of conflict.

Advocating for Maximum Pressure

Credit: DepositPhotos

Leib supports revisiting the Trump administration’s hardline stance against Iran.

He believes a “maximum pressure” campaign could effectively isolate Iran.

Economic Impact

Credit: DepositPhotos

The sanctions under the Trump administration significantly reduced Iran’s international reserves.

This financial pressure demonstrated the potential impact of a concerted economic strategy.

Call for Strategic Reevaluation

Credits: DepositPhotos

Leib argues for a return to policies that had previously constrained Iran’s global influence.

He suggests that reapplying sanctions could curb Iran’s regional aggression.

Iran’s Growing Strength

Credit: DepositPhotos

Despite past pressures, Iran has become stronger, with ties to major powers like Russia and China.

This complicates efforts to reinstate previous policies.

A Strategic Imperative

Credits: DepositPhotos

Leib emphasizes the need for a robust approach to Iran, advocating for immediate action.

The goal is to mitigate threats and promote stability in the Middle East.

Read More From The Stock Dork

Credit: DepositPhotos