1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics
  4. /
  5. Slideshow
  6. /
  7. Supreme Court Ignores Racial...

Supreme Court Ignores Racial Discrimination Appeal for TJ High School Admissions

The Supreme Court chose not to revisit the contentious issue of racial considerations in school admissions.

This decision comes after affirming the end of affirmative action in colleges.

Focus on Virginia School

Credit: DepositPhotos

Virginia’s prestigious Thomas Jefferson High School’s admissions policy was accused of bias against Asian Americans.

The Supreme Court left this policy unchallenged.

Dissenting Voices

Credits: DepositPhotos

Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas were in favor of hearing the case, diverging from their colleagues.

They expressed concern over the lower court’s ruling being upheld.

Alito’s Argument

Credit: DepositPhotos

Justice Alito argued that the lower court’s decision should be corrected for the sake of judicial integrity.

He found the ruling aberrant and deserving of reconsideration.

Prior Rulings on Race

Credit: DepositPhotos

This judicial refusal follows a significant previous ruling that barred race-conscious college admissions policies.

The case had implications for similar admissions policies across the country.

Changes at TJ High

Credit: DepositPhotos

In a shift towards diversity, TJ High School overhauled its admissions to prioritize GPAs and personal assessments over standardized tests.

This change aimed to offer a fair opportunity to all students.

Official Statement

Credits: DepositPhotos

Fairfax County School Board Chair Karl Frisch hailed the new admissions process as constitutional.

He emphasized its fairness and inclusivity for all qualified students.

Legal Opposition

Credits: DepositPhotos

The Coalition for TJ, a group of concerned parents, filed a lawsuit against the school’s new admissions policy.

They claimed it constituted unconstitutional racial discrimination.

Court Reversal

Credits: DepositPhotos

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned an initial ruling in favor of the Coalition for TJ.

The appeals court’s decision sparked significant debate.

Alito’s Critique

Credit: DepositPhotos

Justice Alito, in his dissent, criticized the appeals court for condoning what he saw as intentional racial discrimination.

Justice Thomas joined him in his critique.

Supreme Court’s Temporary Decision

Credits: DepositPhotos

While the appeal was ongoing, the Supreme Court allowed TJ’s new admissions policy to stay in place.

This decision highlighted a divide among the Court’s conservatives.

Impact on Asian American Students

Credit: DepositPhotos

Following the new admissions process at TJ, there was a notable decrease in Asian American student admissions.

The Coalition for TJ pointed to this as evidence of discrimination.

Racial Discrimination Allegations

Credit: DepositPhotos

The Coalition argued that the admissions criteria, although race-neutral on the surface, were designed to discriminate.

They likened it to the discrimination struck down by the Court in previous cases.

County’s Defense of Policy

Credit: DepositPhotos

Fairfax County maintained that its admissions policy was race-neutral and aligned with the 14th Amendment.

They argued it was designed to dismantle socioeconomic barriers.

Broader Educational Debate

Credit: DepositPhotos

This Supreme Court’s decision not to intervene highlights the ongoing national debate around educational equity and diversity.

It reflects the complexities of achieving fairness in school admissions.

Read More From The Stock Dork

Credit: DepositPhotos- Joe Biden and Petro Poroshenko — Stock Editorial Photography