1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics
  4. /
  5. Slideshow
  6. /
  7. Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh...

Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh Backs Biden in Key Social Media Case

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a Trump nominee, surprisingly came to the defense of the Biden administration in a case of social media censorship.

The Case at Hand

Credit: Depositphotos

The controversy revolves around accusations by two GOP attorneys general and several users of social media.

They assert that the administration excessively influenced platforms to remove what it deemed misinformation, infringing on First Amendment freedoms.

A Spectrum of Doubts

Credits: DepositPhotos

The justices expressed reservations about the allegations of undue pressure by the administration on social media companies to censor content.

Kavanaugh’s Perspective

Credit: DepositPhotos

Kavanaugh, known for his conservative leanings, was notably skeptical of the claims, challenging the notion that the administration’s actions constituted a breach of First Amendment rights.

A Clash of Views

Credit: DepositPhotos

During discussions, Justice Kavanaugh contested Justice Alito’s surprise at the administration’s harsh communications with tech giants, suggesting such interactions were commonplace in government dealings.

Government Communication Norms

Credit: DepositPhotos

Kavanaugh shared insights from his time in the George W. Bush administration, indicating that forceful exchanges with the media were not unusual and did not violate constitutional rights.

The Tone of Government Emails

Credit: DepositPhotos

Addressing concerns about the aggressive tone of emails from Biden officials, Kavanaugh argued it was typical of government communications, based on his experience.

Support From Justice Kagan

Credit: DepositPhotos – WASHINGTON D.C., USA – Sep 18, 2014: United States President Barack Obama during an official meeting with the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko in Washington, DC (USA) — Photo by palinchak

Justice Elena Kagan echoed Kavanaugh’s remarks, drawing on her background in the Clinton and Obama administrations to highlight frequent government attempts to influence media coverage.

Courtroom Reactions

Credit: DepositPhotos

The justices’ exchange, particularly on government-media interactions, sparked laughter and highlighted the commonplace nature of such discussions in federal operations.

Lawsuit Background

Credit: DepositPhotos

The legal challenge centers on actions post-January 2021 and post-Biden’s inauguration, despite referencing events from 2020, including the pandemic and election.

Government-Social Media Interactions

Credits: DepositPhotos

Kavanaugh raised concerns over the lawsuit’s aim to restrict government communication with social media platforms, especially in scenarios involving national security.

National Security Concerns

Credit: DepositPhotos

He presented a hypothetical situation to underline the importance of government-media communication in contexts like surveillance and national defense.

Examining Plaintiff’s Harm

Credit: DepositPhotos

The justices also questioned the actual damages experienced by the plaintiffs, suggesting that their demand to restrict the government from regulating social media platforms may not be the right solution.

Read More From The Stock Dork

Credit: DepositPhotos