1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics
  4. /
  5. Slideshow
  6. /
  7. Supreme Court to Review...

Supreme Court to Review Case on Life Insurance Payouts 

Supreme Court to Examine Estate Taxation 

Credit: DepositPhotos

The Supreme Court is set to deliberate on whether life insurance payouts should be counted as corporate assets for federal income tax purposes in estate calculations. The case, Connelly v. Internal Revenue Service, gained attention after the court agreed to review it on December 13. 

High Court Agrees to Hear Tax Dispute Case 

Credit: DepositPhotos

The Supreme Court’s decision to grant certiorari was issued without dissent. This key step requires the support of at least four justices and moves the case towards the oral argument stage. 

Tax Dispute Involving Closely-Held Corporation 

Credit: DepositPhotos

The case revolves around a disagreement over the valuation of a deceased shareholder’s stock in a closely-held corporation. The main point of contention is whether life insurance payouts should influence this valuation. 

Read More: Tennessee Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling, Halting Redrawing of Senate Maps 

Life Insurance in Shareholder Stock Redemption 

Credit: DepositPhotos

Closely-held corporations commonly use life insurance to fund the repurchase of a deceased shareholder’s stock. This practice aims to maintain the business’s closely-held nature but raises legal questions regarding its tax implications. 

Eighth Circuit’s Stance on Estate’s Appeal

Credit: DepositPhotos

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit rejected the appeal made by Thomas Connelly, executor of Michael Connelly’s estate. This ruling in June added complexity to the ongoing legal debate. 

IRS Demands Significant Tax Payment from Estate 

Credit: DepositPhotos

Following Michael Connelly’s death, the IRS claimed the estate owed nearly $1 million in taxes. This figure was based on Crown C Corp.’s failure to report life insurance proceeds, impacting the company’s stock value. 

Also Read: Pope Francis Faces Unprecedented Opposition 

Ownership Distribution in Crown C Corp

Credit: DepositPhotos

Michael Connelly held a significant majority of Crown C Corp.’s shares at the time of his death, owning 77.18%. His brother, Thomas Connelly, owned the remaining 22.82% of the company 

Supreme Court to Assess Insurance Policy Impact 

Credits: DepositPhotos

The Supreme Court will evaluate if the life insurance policy, intended for buying back a deceased co-owner’s shares, should affect stock valuation for estate taxes. This determination could have broad implications for how corporations handle shareholder deaths. 

Contrasting Views on Stock Taxation

Credit: Depositphotos

The estate argues that the stock should not be taxed as the life insurance proceeds were earmarked for repurchasing shares. The IRS counters this, asserting that the stock valuation should reflect its fair market value at the time of the co-owner’s death. 

Read More: White House Press Secretary Refuses To Answer Questions On Durham Report

Determining Fair Market Value in Tax Law

Credit: Depositphotos

Federal estate tax calculations hinge on the fair market value of the deceased’s assets. However, when assets like privately held stock aren’t freely traded, determining their fair market value requires a more complex analysis. 

Solicitor General Advises Against Review

Credit: DepositPhotos

U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar recommended the Supreme Court not review the case, citing established legal precedents. These precedents relate to how estate taxes are applied and calculated based on the deceased’s gross estate value. 

Historical Context and Treasury Regulations

Credit: DepositPhotos

The case delves into various Treasury Department regulations and judicial rulings. These legal frameworks and past court decisions help define how life insurance proceeds should be factored into estate valuations. 

Read Next: Why Is There a Sudden Surge in Congressional Departures? 

Awaiting Supreme Court’s Oral Arguments

Credit: DepositPhotos

The date for the Supreme Court’s oral argument in this case has not been scheduled yet. The decision in this case is poised to clarify federal tax law and its application in situations involving life insurance and estate taxation. 

More from The Stock Dork – Biden Administration Faces Criticism Over Exemptions in EV Tax Credit Rule

Credits: DepositPhotos

More from The Stock Dork – Court Limits Biden Administration’s Changes to Family Planning Program, Allowing Funding for Abortion Referrals

Credits: DepositPhotos

More from The Stock Dork – Russia’s Lavrov Asserts Unchanging Goals in Ukraine at Security Talks

Credits: DepositPhotos

Russia’s Lavrov Asserts Unchanging Goals in Ukraine at Security Talks

More from The Stock Dork – Trump’s Attorney Argues That Georgia Trial Would Disrupt 2024 Campaign

Credits: DepositPhotos

Trump’s Attorney Argues That Georgia Trial Would Disrupt 2024 Campaign

More from The Stock Dork – DeSantis Fulfills Pledge to Visit Every County in Iowa

Credits: DepositPhotos