In today’s deeply divided political landscape, it is evident that both supporters of Donald Trump and Joe Biden utilize similar apocalyptic rhetoric to defend their respective candidates. The polarization of our society has led to the formation of self-absorbed political tribes, with most voters aligning themselves strictly with one side or the other.
As a result, many individuals are resistant to hearing any information that challenges their views and makes it harder to defend their chosen candidate.
Read More: LGBTQ+ Pride Flag Banned In Michigan?
It is essential to address the issue of rhetoric and its impact on public discourse. The use of the phrase “Yes, but” as coined by Andrew Sullivan in his Substack, the Weekly Dish, offers an opportunity to bring nuance and perspective into the conversation.
For example, in discussing Hunter Biden’s business dealings, one can acknowledge his struggles with addiction while also acknowledging concerns about potential unethical behavior. Similarly, it is crucial to address the allegations against President Biden while recognizing that many of them remain unproven, and some sources promoting these claims lack credibility.
The breakdown of trust in the media plays a significant role in the current tribal warfare within politics. While the press has always been subject to biases, the perception of the media aligning closely with one party has eroded its role as an objective arbiter of truth.
Fact-checkers, once seen as impartial, are now often criticized as partisan, leading to a situation where individuals choose to believe their preferred narratives, even if they are rooted in propaganda.
It is crucial to foster open dialogue and encourage people to consider various perspectives. Nevertheless, it remains challenging to navigate this climate of extreme partisanship and lack of trust in the media.