In an article titled “Why Silicon Valley billionaires like Peter Thiel turned against Trump,” The Washington Post failed to mention the crucial issue of migration that underlies the conflict between tech investors and former President Donald Trump. The 2,150-word piece discussed the investors’ alienation from the GOP due to their pro-business agenda, but neglected to acknowledge the voters’ support for Trump’s promise to curb migration, which threatens wages and creates housing shortages.
The exclusion of migration from the article highlights a significant gap in the story, as pointed out by Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Immigration Studies. Silicon Valley investors have generally been advocates for immigration, so it is puzzling that the reporter did not inquire about their changing attitudes towards the Republican Party’s stance on immigration. This omission suggests that the reporter may have asked the question but received no meaningful response worth reporting.
There is evidence to suggest that Silicon Valley investors oppose the GOP’s populist opposition to mass migration. For instance, the influential FWD.us advocacy group, founded by tech investors including Mark Zuckerberg, vehemently opposes Trump’s efforts to curb illegal migration. This lobby group recognizes that increased migration benefits Wall Street’s stock values, despite the negative impact on ordinary Americans. While the Washington Post failed to provide a comprehensive list of investors who support FWD.us, records from other sources reveal the breadth of wealthy backers behind the group’s efforts.
Read More: Biden Walks Off Set During MSNBC Interview, Prompting Criticism and Online Reactions
Migration is also causing a rift between investors and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who initially positioned himself as a mediator between pro-migration donors and low-migration voters. Prominent venture capitalist David Sacks, who previously supported DeSantis, has recently soured on him and organized fundraisers for DeSantis’s rivals. Polls demonstrate that the party cannot simply accept investors’ demands for more migration, as a significant percentage of Republican voters prioritize immigration as an important issue.
It is worth noting that the Washington Post failed to adequately address the influence of migration in the case of Republican presidential candidate and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley. While the article suggested that her foreign policy record attracted donations from investors, it neglected to mention her promises of an immigration giveaway, which align with the interests of Silicon Valley backers. Similarly, the article skimmed over pro-investor immigration and trade policies of another candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy, without elaboration.
On the Democratic side, President Joe Biden and his administration have consistently favored Silicon Valley investors, even before the 2020 election. Biden’s directive to import more foreign graduates for white-collar careers demonstrates a pattern of prioritizing the interests of these investors over those of American graduates. The visa programs employed serve as a means to control foreign workers and displace American workers, perpetuating an exploitative system.
The failure of establishment news outlets, like the Washington Post and The New York Times, to acknowledge the economic consequences of migration is not surprising. Editors and top-level executives may have pro-migration leanings, leading to a refusal to connect the dots and address the detrimental impact of migration on ordinary Americans. The history of unrestricted migration reveals a clear transfer of wealth from ordinary Americans to CEOs, investors, and Wall Street, hindering innovation and exacerbating inequality.
The Washington Post’s Silence on Migration’s Role Fuels Anti-Trump Opposition
A thorough analysis of an article by The Washington Post titled “Why Silicon Valley billionaires like Peter Thiel turned against Trump” reveals a significant oversight—the absence of any mention of migration as a driving factor in the conflict between tech investors and former President Donald Trump. The 2,150-word piece focused on the investors’ disillusionment with the GOP due to its failure to reduce regulation, but it failed to address the popular support Trump garnered for his promise to control immigration and its impact on wages, housing, and employment in the United States.
Read More: Explosive Revelation: Melania Trump’s Ex-Aide Exposes Classified Document Showcasing by Donald Trump
The article’s failure to include the issue of migration suggests a significant gap in the story, according to Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Immigration Studies. Given that Silicon Valley figures generally support immigration, it is surprising that the reporter did not inquire about the connection between the Republican Party’s stance on immigration and the changing attitudes of the investors. Even if the reporter did ask the question, it seems the responses received were not considered worth reporting.
Evidence suggests that Silicon Valley investors, from a self-serving perspective, strongly oppose the GOP’s populist opposition to mass migration. FWD.us, an influential lobby group founded by tech investors, has been vocal in its opposition to Trump’s efforts to curb illegal migration, despite the negative impact on ordinary Americans. The Washington Post failed to provide a complete list of investors supporting FWD.us, but other sources reveal the wide range of wealthy backers behind the group’s initiatives.
Migration also appears to be a key factor driving a wedge between investors and Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. Prominent venture capitalist David Sacks, who initially supported DeSantis, has recently withdrawn his support and instead organized fundraisers for DeSantis’s rivals. Polls demonstrate that the party cannot simply cater to investors’ demands for increased migration, as a significant portion of Republican voters prioritize immigration as a crucial issue.
It is noteworthy that The Washington Post did not adequately explore the influence of migration in the case of Republican presidential candidate and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley. Though the article suggested that her foreign policy record drew support from investors, it failed to mention her promises of an immigration giveaway, which align with the interests of Silicon Valley backers. The article also glossed over the pro-investor immigration and trade policies of another candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy.
President Joe Biden and his administration have consistently favored Silicon Valley investors, evident even before the 2020 election. Biden’s instruction to import more foreign graduates for high-skilled jobs benefits the interests of investors but negatively affects American graduates burdened by debt. The visa programs used to facilitate this influx of foreign workers not only displace American workers but also exert control over these workers throughout their tenure in the country.
The failure of mainstream news outlets such as The Washington Post and The New York Times to acknowledge the economic consequences of migration is to be expected. Editors and executives often hold pro-migration views, leading to a reluctance to address the negative impact of migration on ordinary Americans. The history of unrestricted migration reveals a significant transfer of wealth from ordinary Americans to CEOs, investors, and Wall Street, impeding innovation and perpetuating inequality.
Read More: These Celebrities All Proudly Support Trump – Some on This List May Come as a Surprise!
Malik is a skilled writer with a passion for news and current events. With their keen eye for detail, they provide insightful perspectives on the latest happenings. Stay informed and engaged!
Tags:
