1. Home
  2. /
  3. Politics
  4. /
  5. Article
  6. /
  7. Trans Minors Can No...

Trans Minors Can No Longer Get Gender-Affirming Care in Idaho, Says Supreme Court

In a pivotal decision, the Supreme Court has authorized Idaho to enforce a prohibition on gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors, a law that had been previously halted by lower courts. 

This ruling marks a significant moment in the ongoing national debate over transgender rights and medical care.

With this order, the state of Idaho is now free to go ahead and implement a law passed in 2023 that creates penalties of up to a decade in prison for physicians who offer puberty blockers or hormone therapy to anyone under 18. 

This comes despite the continuation of legal challenges against the law.

Credits: DepositPhotos

Read More: Trump Refers to Illegal Immigrants as ‘Animals’ at Michigan Rally

The justices have, however, allowed a provision for the two defendants who are fighting against this law in a lower court. 

They will continue to receive the medical care that they were getting prior to the passage of the law.

The Supreme Court’s decision was split, with the three liberal justices opposing the enforcement. 

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concern over intervening prematurely in the ongoing legal proceedings.

Credits: DepositPhotos

Initially, a federal judge in Idaho suspended the entire law, citing the need to protect the health and well-being of the transgender youth involved in the case, who reported significant relief of gender dysphoria symptoms due to their ongoing treatments.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which represents teenagers, criticized the high court’s decision as detrimental to transgender youth across Idaho, highlighting the disruption it would cause to many families relying on such medical care.

In a statement, it called the judgment “an awful result for transgender youth and their families across the state. Today’s ruling allows the state to shut down the care that thousands of families rely on while sowing further confusion and disruption.”

Credits: DepositPhotos

Also Read: Ukraine Destroys $169M Warship That Putin Stole in 2014

Idaho’s Attorney General, Raúl Labrador, defended the law, arguing that it was designed to protect children from irreversible treatments and supported by a belief in “biological reality.”

Notwithstanding the legal and political controversies, major medical organizations like the American Psychiatric Association and the American Medical Association continue to endorse gender-affirming care as beneficial for those experiencing gender dysphoria.

The Supreme Court’s action is part of a broader national trend, with numerous states passing similar laws restricting transgender youth from accessing specific medical treatments. 

Credits: DepositPhotos

These laws are often met with legal challenges arguing their constitutionality.

The legal landscape remains turbulent, with the potential for the Supreme Court to address related bans from Kentucky and Tennessee, reflecting the ongoing national division over this deeply contentious issue.

As Idaho begins to enforce this new law, the implications for transgender youth and their families are profound, setting the stage for continued legal battles and public debate over the rights of transgender individuals and the role of state legislation in personal medical decisions.

Read Next: Ukraine’s Defense Deteriorates Against Russian Forces as Congress Debates Aid

Monica Balmes is a talented copywriter with a passion for creating engaging and informative content.